7 AI Video Repurposing Tools for Podcasters: Tested & Compared

In case you’re a content material creator, you’re doubtless in search of out new and revolutionary methods to interact together with your viewers throughout numerous platforms. For podcasters, the problem lies in repurposing your long-form content material into fascinating brief video clips for social media. Luckily, the appearance of AI has revolutionized content material creation, providing a plethora of instruments designed to streamline this course of. Let’s delve into a number of the hottest AI video and content material repurposing instruments tailor-made particularly for podcasters.

Heads up! We use affiliate hyperlinks to a couple of the AI video repurposing instruments talked about on this roundup. We’d earn a small fee, do you have to select to purchase by way of them, although by no means at any additional value. Affiliate earnings helps assist all our free content material, although it by no means clouds our judgement when reviewing instruments and providers, or prevents us from giving our sincere opinions!

1. Opus Clip

Opus Clip distinguishes itself with its adept clip-cutting capabilities, complemented by a B-roll characteristic for enhanced content material selection. Its ‘virality rating’ prediction system aids in deciding on high-quality clips, whereas model templates facilitate cohesive branding. Nevertheless, the filler phrase removing characteristic and occasional uneven clips pose notable drawbacks. Moreover, this system usually mechanically selects sub-par speaker cuts, which may detract from the general high quality and relevance of the content material.

👍 Opus Clip Professionals:

• Exact clip slicing and extension.
• B-roll characteristic for content material supplementation.
• Capability to construct model templates.
• ‘Virality rating’ prediction for clip high quality evaluation.
• Auto submit and scheduling characteristic.

👎 Opus Clip Cons:

• Ineffective filler phrase removing.
• Occasional uneven clip output.
• Processing minute restrict.
• Mechanically selects sub-par speaker cuts.

🛠️ Utilizing OpusClip

• Greatest For: Novice video editors
• Value: $9 USD/month (starter) or $29 USD/month (professional)
• General ranking: 3/5
• Try Opus Clip

2. HeyLisa

HeyLisa presents itself as a promising fusion of Chat GPT and video enhancing. The instrument goals to streamline Instagram reels and YouTube shorts creation with AI-assisted captioning that highlights key phrases in numerous font types and permits prompt-driven formatting. Sadly, it struggles with inefficient clip slicing, sluggish command responses, and restricted precision, usually requiring handbook clip choice earlier than enhancing. Customers should individually create and add clips for captions or speaker cuts, and the software program can’t zoom in on audio system correctly or enable handbook edits, relying solely on chatbot interactions.

Throughout our check, I needed the shot to concentrate on the audio system, minimize to the lively speaker, and embody correct captions. The outcomes have been combined. Whereas captions have been generated, they appeared slowly and didn’t preserve tempo with the dialogue. The zooming in on the speaker and slicing to the lively speaker didn’t work as anticipated. After I requested a 30-second impactful clip, the software program used the primary 30 seconds of footage (the preamble!) as an alternative of choosing probably the most partaking portion. Even with particular timestamps supplied, HeyLisa defaulted to the preliminary section of the video.

👍 HeyLisa Professionals:

• AI-powered caption era with customizable types.
• Immediate-driven formatting changes.
• Integration of titles and descriptions in immediate processing.

👎 HeyLisa Cons:

• Inefficient clip-cutting performance.
• Restricted precision in clip choice.
• Gradual to reply to instructions.
• Requires creating and importing a clip individually for captions or speaker cuts.
• Restricted capacity to zoom in on a speaker correctly.
• No technique to edit or modify issues manually (solely by chatbot).

🛠️ Utilizing HeyLisa

• Greatest For: Novice video editors
• Value: $12/month (part-time) or $30/month (full-time)
• General ranking: 1/5
• Try HeyLisa

3. Flowjin

Flowjin streamlines content material creation with mechanically generated titles, descriptions, and key phrases, doubling as hashtags. Its strong captioning and resizing capabilities are commendable, though video high quality changes could generally fall brief. Clip customization can show difficult, and video cuts may be lower than very best.

👍 Flowjin Professionals:

• Automated title, description, and key phrase era.
• Versatile video resizing and caption customization.

👎 Flowjin Cons:

• Inconsistent video high quality changes.
• Restricted clip customization choices.
• Video cuts are lower than optimum. 

🛠️ Utilizing Flowjin

• Greatest For: Novice video editors
• Value: $10/month (Starter), $15/month (Creator), $68/month (Progress)
• General ranking: 2/5
• Try Flowjin

4. VEED.io

VEED.io stands out for its handbook clip enhancing, providing exact cuts and customizable captions. The inclusion of music provides to its enchantment, however its AI clip era is restricted to the Professional model, which limits a few of its superior options. The inclusion of captions in VEED.io felt unintuitive and was, total, a sub-par characteristic.

👍 VEED.io Professionals:

• Guide clip enhancing with exact cuts.
• Customizable captions and music integration.

👎 VEED.io Cons:

• AI clip era is restricted to the Professional model.
• Captions are unintuitive and sub-par.
• Poor performance when zooming in on the speaker.

🛠️ Utilizing VEED.io

• Greatest For: Extra skilled video editors
• Value: $24/month (Primary), $40/month (Professional), $95/month (Enterprise)
• General ranking: 3/5
• Try VEED.io

5. Vizard

Vizard boasts a ‘virality rating’ prediction system and commendable caption/subtitle era. Its numerous font choices and simple framing changes improve consumer expertise. Nevertheless, the default use of emojis in subtitles could deter some customers.

👍 Vizard Professionals:

• ‘Virality rating’ prediction for clip high quality.
• Numerous font choices and adjustable framing.
• Good at deciding on high quality clips.
• Superior video high quality and formatting efficiency.

👎 Vizard Cons:

• Default use of emojis in subtitle (though, these may be eliminated).

🛠️ Utilizing Vizard

• Greatest For: Novice video editors
• Value: $10.67/month (Creator) or $32/month (Professional)
• General ranking: 4/5
• Try Vizard

6. Descript

Descript shines with its array of templates, that are notably fitted to a number of speaker clips prevalent in podcasts. Its seamless textual content enhancing and adjustable captions are noteworthy, alongside options like soundwave traces for audio podcast clips. Nevertheless, the desktop app requirement could pose a limitation for some customers, and talking formatting proves to be difficult. For a deeper dive, take a look at our full Descript review and Best Descript Alternatives roundup.

👍 Descript Professionals:

• Versatile templates for a number of speaker clips.
• Seamless textual content enhancing and adjustable captions.

👎 Descript Cons:

• Desktop app requirement for optimum performance.
• Formatting the audio system may be difficult.

🛠️ Utilizing Descript

• Greatest For: Newcomers and extra skilled video editors
• Value: $12/month (Creator), $24/month (Professional), $40/month (Enterprise)
• General ranking: 4/5
• Try Descript

7. Spikes Studio

Spikes Studio affords simple clip changes by way of transcript enhancing, alongside customizable clip lengths and the choice so as to add b-roll, social logos, GIFs, and stickers. Nevertheless, the restricted caption positions, lack of flexibility in clip customization, and subpar zoom video high quality could deter some customers. Moreover, it isn’t nice for slicing AI clips, requiring customers to have their very own clip timestamps minimize prior.

👍 Spikes Studio Professionals:

• Transcript-based clip enhancing and customizable clip lengths.
• Choice so as to add b-roll, social logos, GIFs, and stickers.

👎 Spikes Studio Cons:

• Restricted caption positions.
• Little flexibility in clip customization.
• Zoom video high quality will not be optimum.
• Not efficient for slicing AI clips; requires pre-cut timestamps.

🛠️ Utilizing Spikes Studio

• Greatest For: Newcomers and extra skilled video editors
• Value: $0/month (Primary), $17.99/month (Professional), $72.99/month (Enterprise)
• General ranking: 3/5
• Try Spikes Studio

Descript and Vizard carried out greatest total throughout our testing of those AI video repurposing instruments. On the flip facet, HeyLisa is a really promising idea, however our expertise this time round was poor. Your mileage could fluctuate if you happen to’re utilizing free tiers and trials to check these platforms your self. Undoubtedly, the oldsters behind these instruments will attempt to make fixes, enhancements, and enhancements on a regular basis, too.

AI Instruments for Podcasters: The Final Listing for 2024

If you’re keen to learn more about repurposing, then check out our full guide to Content Stacking, too. Right here, you’ll see how textual content, audio, and video can all work harmoniously – and that doesn’t imply tripling your workload, both!